Introducing San Francisco History of the Tower of London Grand Central Station Visitors Guide
Showing posts with label tech. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tech. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 12, 2012



After months waiting for Yahoo's CEO Marissa Mayer to put her stamp on the company, we may be getting close. A report out late today from All Things D suggests that Yahoo is readying "a major overhaul" of Yahoo Mail for December that will sport "a cleaner, 'more Gmail-like' design."
Not much more is known. Even the original rumor was unclear what this might translate into when it came to the look of the redesign. Given all the attention Mayer devoted to mobile during the course of the company's recent quarterly earnings call, that might be in the cards.
Yahoo declined to comment on the report, but one thing is clear -- the goal of just such a revamp would be to crawl out from under the shadow of Google's Gmail. When Mayer was named Yahoo's chief executive in August, one of her first orders of business was to improve Yahoo's search and e-mail offerings, reportedly holding meetings with Yahoo product leaders to determine why its chief products were losing market.Yahoo, however, holds a comfortable lead in the United States with 76.7 million, compared to second-place Gmail with 69.1 million and third-place Hotmail with 35.5 million.Even though the company released a new Mail service in May 2011 with new social-networking features, Yahoo continues to trail Google's Gmail and Microsoft's Hotmail in a tight race for e-mail provider dominance. In data for October released by ComScore, Gmail saw 287.9 million unique worldwide visitors during the period, edging out Hotmail, which finished with 286.2 million uniquevisitors. Yahoo -- the once mighty e-mail power -- came in third with 281.7 million.

There hasn't quite been this much hype, intrigue, and mystery around an Apple product since the first iPad.
We're speaking, of course, about Apple's TV set. A device that began as a twinkle in an analyst's eye, and has since ballooned into what just about everyone expects Apple to roll out as its next major flagship product.
But where are these rumors coming from? How have they changed? And most importantly, how are you supposed to keep up with them? CNET's rounded down all the major ones below, a document we plan to keep lovingly updated as more tidbits make their way out. (Editors' note: This story was originally published on May 7, 2012. It has been regularly updated since then.)
December 12, 2012
Apple TV is in 'early stage of testing,' report says 
It's not a formal project yet, but Apple and suppliers Sharp and Hon Hai (aka Foxconn) are trying out designs for a large-screen, high-resolution TV, according to the Wall Street Journal. The newspaper's sources say that Apple has been testing television set prototypes "for a number of years."
December 11, 2012
Apple TV? You're ready to pay extra, analyst says 
Morgan Stanley analyst Katy Huberty tells investors that consumers would be willing to pay a 20 percent premium on an Apple-made television, and that there's twice as much interest in purchasing such a unit versus Apple's mobile devices. That's based on the findings of a research survey the firm did, polling users on possible Apple TV scenarios.
December 6, 2012
Apple TV hinted at by CEO Tim Cook
In an interview with NBC, Apple CEO Cook notes that the TV experience in his own living room is like having "gone backwards in time by 20 to 30 years," and that "it's an area of intense interest," for the company. It's not the first time Cook's been grilled over the company's own living room plans, but one of the first times Cook has said that Apple is eyeballing ways to improve the TV experience.
November 28, 2012
Time Warner CEO wants Apple to make a TV 
Time Warner CEO Jeff Bewkes tells attendees at a Business Insider conference he'd be very interested in Apple making a TV set, highlighting Apple's "great" devices as a good example of what could be done in the TV arena.
November 20, 2012
Apple TV won't debut until late 2013, says analyst 
Somewhat rebutting a report from Jefferies & Co., Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster tells investors not to expect an Apple TV until late into 2013, specifically in November to match up with the holiday shopping season. Munster says the set would likely retail for $1,500 to $2,000 and be somewhere in the 42-inch to 55-inch range.
November 15, 2012
Analyst: Apple TV launch is 'imminent'
In a note to investors about cable technology company Arris Group, Jefferies & Co's James Kisner says the firm has heard rumblings from industry contacts that at least one major cable operator has been doing some tests to see if it can handle the extra bandwidth of an Apple TV set, suggesting its release is just around the corner.
November 12, 2012
New iPhone, iPad, and 'iTV' slated for first half of 2013? 
The China Times says Apple is readying an "iTV" device for the first half of 2013. The report is unclear about whether that's a full-fledged TV set, or an updated version of Apple's current set-top box.
September 6, 2012
No new Apple TV this year, report says
With negotiations still in flux, Apple has no plans to put out a TV set or a new set-top box, says Bloomberg. In a report that cites anonymous sources, the outlet says Apple is still trying to work out deals with content companies and cable providers to decide who gets to sell the device: cable operators or Apple.
August 24, 2012
Apple exec: Television may not be in the cards for now
After an interview with Apple executive Eddy Cue, Pacific Crest analyst Andy Hargreaves shares with investors the feeling he got that Apple is not so hot about getting into the TV business.
August 16, 2012
Apple envisions new cloud DVR, social space in set-top box 
In a follow-up to its report from the day before, The Wall Street Journal adds that Apple will bring digital video recording technology into its set-top box, along with user interface elements like what's seen on the iPad.
August 15, 2012
Apple TV could double as cable box, report says
Citing "people familiar with the matter," The Wall Street Journal says Apple has been in talks with cable operators in the U.S. to pitch its $99 set-top box as an alternative to the cable boxes that cable subscribers rent. The report suggests no deals have yet been made toward that goal but that Apple has at least talked with cable provider Time Warner.
Apple's DVR patent.
Apple's DVR patent.
(Credit: USPTO)
August 14, 2012
Apple gets a patent for an Apple TV cable box
OK, so patents don't always lead to products or product features, but boy is this one interesting. Apple has been granted a patent that shows content playing while a user pulls up a menu that shows what's playing on other channels. The company originally filed for the patent in late-2006. Then there was no way to watch live TV channels on an Apple TV set-top box. And there still isn't.
June 21, 2012
Sharp set to deliver Apple TV parts to Foxconn in Q3?
Citing sources, Chinese news site 21cbh.com says Foxconn will begin getting parts -- specifically LCD displays from Sharp -- sometime in the fourth quarter to begin work on an Apple TV set.
An Apple TV software development kit?
An Apple TV software development kit?
(Credit: Apple)
June 8, 2012
Apple TV to get its own SDK with apps to follow, report says
Adding to its previous claims of newly updated Apple TV software at WWDC, Boy Genius Report says Apple will offer a full-on software development kit for the platform. Said SDK would let developers build apps for the set-top box, just like they could for iOS and the Mac.
May 30, 2012
New Apple TV OS to debut at WWDC, report says
Mobile tech blog Boy Genius Report says Apple will unveil an updated version of its Apple TV operating system at its annual Worldwide Developers Conference that includes a feature to let the set-top box control third-party hardware.
May 28, 2012
Foxconn reportedly begins pilot production of Apple TV set
China Business News says that Foxconn is in the "trial production stage" of making TV sets for Apple. No other details are provided about the set, however.
May 25, 2012
Apple TV slated to debut in December?
Apple could have its TV set ready by December, with it ready to ship in early 2013, according to Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster. In the same note, Munster said the set would cost between $1,500 and $2,000 and run the gamut from 42 to 55 inches.
May 24 2012
Another idea for Apple's rumored TV: An 'iDevice'
Forrester analyst James McQuivey suggests a TV set from Apple would be more like a giant iPad married with Microsoft Kinect, enabling both touch and gesture controls, and apps.
May 14, 2012
Foxconn refutes claim it's making Apple TV sets
Apple manufacturing partner Foxconn says its chief executive made no such mention of working on an Apple TV set at a news conference in Shanghai, and that any reports otherwise are inaccurate. In a statement, the company said that chief executive Terry Gou "made it very clear that he would neither confirm nor speculate about Foxconn's involvement in the product," and that it was the company's policy not to talk about what it was working on for any customer.
HDTV maker Loewe surges, even as it nixes Apple rumor
It was an unconfirmed rumor and Loewe has said there's "absolutely nothing" to it. But considering Apple's penchant for secrecy and its efforts to keep past acquisitions out of the spotlight, Loewe shareholders are seemingly not so sure they can trust the company's dismissal.
May 11, 2012 - updated May 14
Foxconn chief weighs in on Apple television. Or not
The Apple supplier issues a denial to reports that CEO Terry Gou had said Foxconn was getting ready to produce the feverishly anticipated, but never yet announced, device.
Apple's third-generation Apple TV set top box arrived in early March, bringing 1080p with it.
Apple's third-generation Apple TV set top box arrived in early March, bringing 1080p with it.
(Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET)
May 7, 2012
Apple HDTV prototype spotted, blog claims
Cult of Mac says it has a source who has seen Apple's rumored television, which apparently looks like a large Apple computer display, has built-in iSight, and makes use of Siri. There's even a picture! Well, OK, a mockup.
May 3, 2012
Apple TV set may not launch until 2014, says analyst
J.P. Morgan analyst Mark Moskowitz has some bad news for those expecting an Apple-made TV set sometime in 2012. In a note, Moskowitz said that the "economics of the TV industry are strained," and that Apple was not going to hop into the crowded market until it could garner better margins.
April 27, 2012
Apple TV set chatter heats up with rumored content talks
According to Reuters, movie channel Epix -- a joint venture of Paramount, Lionsgate and MGM -- has been in talks with Apple to bring its content to Apple's digital stores. The interesting tidbit, Reuters says, is that Apple's been pitching a deal that would bring the content beyond its $99 set top box, and to "upcoming devices that stream content."
April 5, 2012
Apple's iTV: Will it be called iPanel?
In a note to investors, Jefferies analyst Peter Misek says the expected television from Apple will be "far more than a TV." Misek added that the device would be called the "iPanel."
"We now believe the iTV could be called 'iPanel' as it is far more than a TV; it is a display, gaming center, media hub, computer, home automator, etc," he said. "Also, Apple would likely have difficulty getting naming rights from the UK TV network ITV."
February 6, 2012
Canadian telecoms vie to become Apple TV launch partner
Cable companies Rogers Communications and BCE have been in talks with Apple to be the launch network for Apple's TV set, says The Globe and Mail. Citing multiple unnamed forces, the outlet added that both companies already have the product in their labs for testing.
Apple TV for $1,499? Would you buy it?
A Best Buy customer survey asks the question of whether a 42-inch Apple HDTV would sit well at $1,499. The survey mentions that the device would have iOS and be able to buy and play apps and games from the App Store. It would also be hooked up to iCloud to store movies, TV shows and music. Other features include iSight cameras and microphones. The next day, Best Buy said that survey was "hypothetical."
January 31, 2012
Apple reportedly scouting TV display components
In a note to investors, Piper Jaffray's Gene Munster mentions speaking to "a major TV component supplier who has been contacted by Apple regarding various capabilities of their television display components." Adding to that, Munster says meetings in Asia suggested the company was scouting investments on LCD technology between 3.5 to 55-inches.
January 4, 2012
The 50-inch Apple TV set rumor re-emerges
In a report about Apple's rumored TV business, USA Today cites an unnamed source who worked at Apple who said that "Apple is said to be looking at a 42-inch or larger LCD TV with built-in Wi-Fi." That same source said Apple VP of industrial design Jony Ive already had "a slick 50-inch TV" in the company's design studio.
December 27, 2011
First Apple TVs to come this summer at 32 and 37 inches?
According to Taiwan-based component news site Digitimes, Apple is in the process of ordering components to build 32-inch and 37-inch TV sets, which would go on sale in the second half of 2012.
December 18, 2011
Voice-controlled Apple TV in the works?
Apple executives have reportedly been in talks with media executives at several companies, says the Wall Street Journal. The report added that Apple's working on a technology that can identify users on devices like phones, tablets and TVs. Further out is technology that would let users change channels and search for content with their voice (presumably using Apple's Siri voice assistant), the Journal's sources said.
December 1, 2011
Apple TV sets will be mighty pricey, analyst says
Talking to attendees at Business Insider's Ignition conference, Piper Jaffray's Gene Munster suggested that if Apple's TV will cost quite a bit more than standard TV sets. The example given was an $800 set, which Munster said would run customers $1,600. There would, however, be several choices and configurations to pick from Munster offered.
October 25, 2011
iTunes creator working on Apple TV, report says
The person leading Apple's internal TV efforts is the same one who helped create iTunes and develop the iPod, according to Bloomberg. Citing multiple sources, the outlet reported the Jeff Robin, Apple's vice president of consumer applications had a prototype in the works.
October 24, 2011
The 50-inch Apple TV set rumor re-emerges
Apple's TV set will be 42-inches or larger with built-in Wi-Fi according to an unnamed Apple source who talked to USA Today. That same source said Apple VP of industrial design Jony Ive already had "a slick 50-inch TV" in the company's design studio.
July 25, 2011
Rumor: New Apple iDevice to be 55-inch OLED TV
According to a "Hollywood lawyer" interviewed by online lifestyle outlet Smarthouse, Apple's been in talks to get the rights for U.S. TV shows. That same source said that the TV would feature OLED screen technology, hang in the 55-inch category, and launch sometime in 2012.
July 11, 2011
Analyst: Apple ripe for HDTV and 'Genius Squad'
In a note to investors, UBS Investment Research analyst Maynard Um offers up that Apple could expand its tech support offerings with the help of a TV set. Um suggests that Apple's in a good position to boost its market cap by anywhere from $50 billion to $100 billion by getting into the business of making and selling connected TV sets. Um cites growth in both the flat-panel TV market, as well as Internet-connected set-top boxes, adding that Apple could expand its Genius Bar support services with a paid element to help the customer get it set up back at his or her home.
(Credit: Apple)
June 23, 2011
Analyst: iCloud linked to Apple's TV ambitions
Piper Jaffray's Gene Munster says Apple's iCloud will be the key to Apple's television efforts. "Apple's iCloud service for media storage makes it simpler to own multiple Apple devices and share content among them," Munster wrote in a note to investors. "At first the only media iCloud will store is music and pictures, but we believe Apple may add movies and TV shows purchased or rented in iTunes to the iCloud service, which could be viewed on a TV."
April 13, 2011
Report: Apple TV set could be coming this year
In a note to investors, Ticonderoga Securities analyst Brian White said that Apple was moving towards offering a TV set of its own "at a faster pace than the market expected," and could have that product launch by the end of the year.
February 18, 2011
Job listing hints at work on Apple TV set
A new job listing says the company's looking for people who know about power supply for, among other gadgets, televisions. Could the Apple TV finally be ready to morph into an Apple-branded television?
January 3, 2011
Will Apple release a TV by end of 2012?
Piper Jaffray's Gene Munster sent a note to investors saying Apple would be in the TV market by the end of 2012. "While Apple's commitment to the living room remains a 'hobby,' we continue to believe the company will enter the TV market with a full focus, as an all-in-one Apple television could move the needle when connected TVs proliferate," Munster said.

Monday, December 10, 2012



The Bloomberg report reads:Apple will spend $100 million to bring production jobs back to the United States and according to a new report by Bloomberg that effort will help create 200 new job in the tech manufacturing sector.

Apple
 is believed to be working with Asian manufacturer Foxconn to build out its US operations. Foxconn recently announced interest in bringing its production know-how to the United States.The investment “sounds like a 200-job operation with about a million-unit output,” said Dan Luria, a labor economist at Michigan Manufacturing Technology Center in Plymouth, Michigan, who studies factory operations. Apple will probably rely on tax breaks and other incentives for the facility, he said. [...]
While Apple’s commitment could set a precedent for electronics suppliers, it probably doesn’t presage a large or rapid shift of production back to the U.S., said Michael Marks, the former CEO of Flextronics International Ltd., which was the largest contract manufacturer in the world before the rise of Foxconn. He also estimates $100 million may create about 200 jobs.
It will be interesting to see how well Foxconn can run a profitable business in the United States, the company is constantly under fire for paying near slave wages to employees throughout China. Foxconn employees have also argued that the company forces them to work long hour in horrendous working conditions.
Apple isn’t the only company bringing computer assembly back to the United States, competitor Lenovo recently announced plans to produce computers in North Carolina.  Lenovo will hire approximately 100 workers while producing several hundred thousand units annually.

Sunday, December 9, 2012



The Bloomberg report reads:Apple will spend $100 million to bring production jobs back to the United States and according to a new report by Bloomberg that effort will help create 200 new job in the tech manufacturing sector.
The investment “sounds like a 200-job operation with about a million-unit output,” said Dan Luria, a labor economist at Michigan Manufacturing Technology Center in Plymouth, Michigan, who studies factory operations. Apple will probably rely on tax breaks and other incentives for the facility, he said. [...]
While Apple’s commitment could set a precedent for electronics suppliers, it probably doesn’t presage a large or rapid shift of production back to the U.S., said Michael Marks, the former CEO of Flextronics International Ltd., which was the largest contract manufacturer in the world before the rise of Foxconn. He also estimates $100 million may create about 200 jobs.
Apple is believed to be working with Asian manufacturer Foxconn to build out its US operations. Foxconn recently announced interest in bringing its production know-how to the United States.
It will be interesting to see how well Foxconn can run a profitable business in the United States, the company is constantly under fire for paying near slave wages to employees throughout China. Foxconn employees have also argued that the company forces them to work long hour in horrendous working conditions.
Apple isn’t the only company bringing computer assembly back to the United States, competitor Lenovo recently announced plans to produce computers in North Carolina.  Lenovo will hire approximately 100 workers while producing several hundred thousand units annually.



The Bloomberg report reads:Apple will spend $100 million to bring production jobs back to the United States and according to a new report by Bloomberg that effort will help create 200 new job in the tech manufacturing sector.
The investment “sounds like a 200-job operation with about a million-unit output,” said Dan Luria, a labor economist at Michigan Manufacturing Technology Center in Plymouth, Michigan, who studies factory operations. Apple will probably rely on tax breaks and other incentives for the facility, he said. [...]
While Apple’s commitment could set a precedent for electronics suppliers, it probably doesn’t presage a large or rapid shift of production back to the U.S., said Michael Marks, the former CEO of Flextronics International Ltd., which was the largest contract manufacturer in the world before the rise of Foxconn. He also estimates $100 million may create about 200 jobs.
Apple is believed to be working with Asian manufacturer Foxconn to build out its US operations. Foxconn recently announced interest in bringing its production know-how to the United States.
It will be interesting to see how well Foxconn can run a profitable business in the United States, the company is constantly under fire for paying near slave wages to employees throughout China. Foxconn employees have also argued that the company forces them to work long hour in horrendous working conditions.
Apple isn’t the only company bringing computer assembly back to the United States, competitor Lenovo recently announced plans to produce computers in North Carolina.  Lenovo will hire approximately 100 workers while producing several hundred thousand units annually.


Lindsay Lohan braless shopping photos turned the afternoon of vintage clothing browsing into a headline generating outing. While cruising vintage shops in Venice, California, LiLo opted to go braless while wearing a white halterneck and backless top. The Lindsay Lohan “sideboob” images almost immediately filtered onto the internet, prompting scoffs from fashionistas.


Lohan, adorned in Chanel sunglasses, was photographed outside a Venice vintage shop braless while on a smoke break. Little did LiLo know that her nicotine craving would generate such a stir. The braless Lindsay Lohan photo may be the subject of fashion backlash from some circles, but the Mean Girls actress is also being heralded for her willingness to showcase her curves, despite the sideboob cleavage noted in the photos, according to the Daily Mail.

LiLo, a 36D, noted she developed late and still had baby fat until she was 16, according to Cosmopolitan interview excerpts republished by the Daily Mail. The actress also stated how much she does not like talking about her chest measurements, which did not begin forming until she was 17. Lohan said her formerly small breast size made her feel insecure, and she admitted she used to stuff her bra. All Lohan’s insecurities over her cup size must have faded away, as she posed for Playboy magazine last December.

Lindsay Lohan on her Playboy spread:

“Knowing your body and being in touch with your body is important because it gives you confidence and in life, women need confidence. It’s a very male-dominated world, so knowing yourself and being comfortable with your body is an important thing for me as a woman.”

The braless Lindsay Lohan was shopping with her brother Cody when the photos were taken. Cody Lohan recently finished filming The Canyons with porn star James Deen. Lindsay Lohan just wrapped on Liz & Dick and will also appear in Scary Movie 5 and Machete Kills.


Advertisements will "follow" users across different devices using software that builds up a clearer picture of their interests with the use of harvested statistics.

A database created by the company Drawbridge gathers information on users' separate devices and builds up an anonymous profile of them through monitoring their browser type and time spent on websites.
A user profile is generated through an analysis of "cookies," which track users clicks on websites, producing statistics that indicate the likelihood of a trail of clicks being from one human source.
So far the company has created profiles connecting 200 million users, which it hopes will be used to target them with advertisements relevant to their interests.
Although the data contains no login names or location information, Drawbridge is confident that users' web habits alone are informative enough to target them very precisely, and to follow them across different platforms for web browsing.
A spokesman for the UK's Information Commissioners Office, which oversees what is done with personal data, told the BBC that Drawbridge would have to ensure certain safeguards were kept before any UK launch.
The data would have to be truly anonymised and individual identities should not be revealed,

The BBC's Radio 4 Today programme struggles not to have the "same old blokes", according to presenter Evan Davis who says and he is "acutely aware of its own shortcomings" over the lack of female presenters.

Evan Davis: too many 'old blokes' on BBC Radio 4's Today programme
Mr Davis, one of the public broadcaster’s leading interviewers, said the BBC needs to do “quite a bit more” to promote female presenters on air.
Speaking at an industry awards ceremony yesterday, the veteran journalist said there was "definitely" more effort needed to promote women within the media, particularly the BBC.
He said: “Off air, I think they do all right. At the BBC we've had plenty of women in good management jobs.
“It comes and goes but there's been plenty. On air, I think there's quite a bit more we can do.”
His comments come amid criticism of the corporation over the lack of female presence on its main television and radio shows.
"I don't know what it is about the industry, but let's face it, this is one where they (women) do flourish and it's great to recognise that."
Figures show that fewer than one in five guests appearing on the Radio 4 show are women.
Among the winners at the awards yesterday was Clare Balding, who collected “achievement of the year” in recognition for her Olympic and Paralympic coverage.
The BBC sports presenter: "I think it's important for young girls who are, I hope, watching us and thinking 'that's a job I want to do' to know that warmth, humour, intelligence, doing your homework – that's what matters.
“I'm not getting this award because of what I look like, or my dress sense – we all know that."

Saturday, December 8, 2012


Known traditionally for the hard life, due to lack of basic amenities there, Jharkhand’s tribal villages have it much easier now, thanks to the Government’s sturdy development initiative.
These days, radios, TV sets, even cable television, mobile phones, memory cards and pen drives can be found in those nomadic tribal villages, especially in hilly areas.
There was a time when nothing was available in the villages. Even getting foodgrain was tough job. Nowadays, however, tribals are getting more attracted towards the life of people living in surrounding villages.
Mobile phones are available for the same price as a goat. They are also an affordable way for tribe members to take advantage of modern day technologies without losing their wonderful, rich traditions.
Instead of raging against their destiny, they have made things tolerable by cutting out luxuries and concentrating on necessities. These are not the impulsive purchases of people who are not thinking hard about what they are doing.
Despite lacking a ‘material culture, about 30 per cent of Birhors, a primitive nomadic tribe, have been found to listen to the radio and follow the language and programmes. A study found that some Birhor families even have TV antennas on their roofs.
Budhan Birhor, residing at Darukasmar of Mandu block, did not buy his TV on credit - he saved up over many months just as a mother starts saving for her young daughter’s wedding by buying small pieces of jewellery and utensils.
In a few regions (hilly terrains), which lack mobile network, several youth have trendy cellphones and tablets (especially Chinese phones), using them as a multimedia device for listening to songs and watching video clips.
It is generally believed that though tribe find it difficult to make both ends meet, and sometimes don’t have enough to buy their food, even the poorest can afford a cellphone!
Mobile phones can play a vital role in the holistic development of the primitive tribe. Even in the most remote regions of Jharkhand — where indigenous people have almost no access to mainstream news in a language they can understand, where almost all communication is done by word of mouth — the phone gives them a new kind of power to improve their lives.
With the Government initiatives, a quick mobile phone call can lead to food delivery for hungry children, investigation into police brutality, payment for workers and access to much-needed medication.

With reports that Google is likely to be let off the hook with minor restrictions on its behavior, the Federal Trade Commission seems ready to punt on the most important antitrust case to come across its desk in years.
Given how narrowly the FTC had been approaching the case in the first place, that’s probably a good thing for consumers, since it means we can hope for the Department of Justice or state attorneys general to move forward in the future on a more comprehensive case against Google’s monopoly abuses.  Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), a former state AG in Connecticut, has already argued, “If the [FTC] investigation concludes without a finding that would warrant some action, the Justice Department can take action as well to investigate and secure remedies.”
In fact, that’s exactly what happened with the Microsoft probe in the 1990s.  The Federal Trade Commission first looked at the Windows operating system monopoly problem back in 1991, but the department punted the case in 1993.   But that led the Department of Justice and state attorneys general across the country to take on Microsoft – see John Heilemann’s near-epic Wired recounting of the twists of that case – leading ultimately to the court decisions and consent decrees that reined in that company’s abuses over the last decade.
The problem has been that the FTC – and even its slightly more aggressive European counterparts – has been focusing on a handful of issues, like abuses of Google’s patents and its manipulation of search results.   While important, these are ultimately only symptoms of how Google uses its economic power to benefit itself.
What needs to be addressed in any antitrust probe is the source of Google’s monopoly power, namely its overwhelming control of user data.   Data is the oil power of the online economy, fueling advertising and profits, and Google is the modern Standard Oil dominating control of that data.
It’s not just all the search data that Google collects.
  • Watch a video online? You’re probably feeding Google more data on your YouTube viewing habits.
  • Sending an email?  All you Gmail users are giving Google a blow-by-blow on your interests through the text of emails.
  • Checking your location on your cellphone?  You’re probably feeding Google location data through its Google maps and more general geolocation services.
  • Visiting any website?  Google is tracking data on you through the Google Analytics software used by most websites to evaluate traffic on their sites.
  • Or just surfing the web means you’re almost certainly being tracked by Google cookies and web ads delivered up through its DoubleClick visual ads subsidiary.
With that unprecedented amount of data about online users, Google becomes the only game in town for most online advertisers seeking to deliver ads to users searching words or products online.  Google faces no viable competition in the search advertising field because of this control of data.  Microsoft’s Bing loses as estimated $2.5 billion per year because Google is able to charge such a premium price to advertisers over its main rival.  And most so-called alternative search options for users are actually Google partners, either using its search technology or delivering up user data even without the Google brand in the online header.
Some antitrust regulators are beginning to admit that they need to change their view of how big data and its control should change antitrust policy.  Joaquín Almunia, who heads competition policy for the European Union, gave a speech last week where he admitted,  “Companies evidently try to use their access to personal data to gain commercial advantage vis à vis users.”   But this has not led to antitrust authorities in either Europe or the United States fully grappling with its implications for retraining Google’s power or other companies like it in other markets where control of user data will reinforce monopoly power.
The problem for consumers is not just that advertisers will face higher prices – with users ultimately getting those costs passed on to them.   The deeper problem, as I outlined last year in my Cost of Lost Privacy series, is that this deep control of user data allows Google to sell what can be predatory access to advertisers.  Payday lenders use Google to track financially distressed consumers to offer punishing terms, illegal online pharmacies offer illegal or fake drugs, and con job “loan adjustment firms” can find and ripoff homeowners with underwater mortgages.   More generally, advertisers can engage in a range of what economists call price discrimination to extract the highest price from each consumer and expanding  corporate profits at the expense of the consuming public generally.
If the FTC and European regulators are not yet ready to deal with the ultimate source of Google’s economic power, its control of user data, and the broad consumer harm being inflicted by its day-to-day tracking of user behavior on behalf of its advertising clients, then it may be just as well that any likely settlements in coming months will be limited.
As long as they don’t foreclose alternative investigative paths in any settlement, ideally the U.S. Department of Justice and the state attorneys general will step up with more comprehensive investigations in coming years, just as they did after the FTC punted on the Windows monopoly problem in the early 1990s.
Powered by Blogger.